Dear sir,

As a Moroccan citizen living in the US, I have been shocked by your article about Hicham Mandari, "scandal of the edition".

First of all, the whole article is based on speculation. Talk is cheap sir, but you need to show evidence of what you said, because otherwise, you're committing a crime against an institution that is beloved by my people.

Sir, you talk about documents that the known criminal has, and we as Moroccans have heard about such documents for two years, I'm asking you,  where are they? why don't you publish them to "enlighten" the arab public. I guess the answer is simple, they don't exist.

Hicham Mandari is a Moroccan citizen who has committed crimes worldwide. The Moroccan government précised many times that he has no links with the palace in any way, and in all what you wrote, I could not find a shred of evidence that he has any links. You even claim one thing and its contrast. You claim that Mr Mandari is responsible for criminal acts, and you make a link between those acts and the person of the king, while few lines before you say that the king and Mandari hate each other, for some mysterious love affair? does it sound logical for you?

Sir, I like when you clarify that part of your claims are only hypothesis, but I would have liked more if you could only publish facts instead of claims of a criminal, which I find contradictory with the good reputation of your paper.

Regards,

Assalamu Alaikum.

I have copied the letter to Queen Rania in text format below as requested.
Wassalam
Hasan Ali Imam

Her Majesty Queen Rania Al-Abdullah 
Royal Hashemite Court 
Amman
Jordan 
cc: Arabtimes@aol.com

From: Hasan Ali Imam
40 Alderney Ave
Heston
Middx.
TW5 0QL
UK

25/05/02

Your Majesty

Assalamu Alaikum.

I recently came across your article to the Arab Times (12/11/01) on a website regarding the issue of the hijab. I would like to thank you for sharing your thoughts and opinions regarding this topic. In brief, my understanding is that you only accept the Quran as source of shariah and reject the sayings of the prophet (S) by virtue of the fact that it is tantamount to idolatry. And since the verse on veiling does not directly talk about covering the head, it therefore implies that women dont have to cover their heads or that they should be modest in accordance with their cultural norms. Furthermore, since women have worn veils before Islam in other communities, it is therefore a remnant of the past and nothing to do with Islam.

My primary response is as follows:

Last November 2001, I went to New York for the weekend and paid a visit to Ground Zero. The amount of devastation and destruction of human life, as well as property was mind boggling and completely deplorable. It felt like being in a war zone. Those who committed this crime waged war against Islam and the rest of humanity because the murderers had broken the Islamic rules of valuing human life (civilians). It was a sombre moment to see the deplorable evil that humans can do.

Today, I attended a talk about the Israeli injustices against Christians and Muslims in the Occupied Territories. I heard speeches by British people, as well as Arabs who visited Israel and brought back stories of tragedies and injustices against Palestinians. One thing I wont forget was the video footage which a Scottish lawyer showed us. He took some footage in Jenin and what he showed us was shocking. Complete devastation of property and human life. I remember seeing the charred remains of a body buried in rubble. Furthermore, there was an eerie silence in the area as the film was being taken. It brought back memories of the devastation in New York. No respect for human life whatsoever. There are one billion Muslims in the world and we are sat helpless whilst innocent people die. Another speaker was a Member of the Scottish Parliament here in the UK, and he recounted his experiences in the Occupied Territoriesthat of oppression by the Israeli army and the Israeli Govt. He was kind enough to give me some documents to read which lists cases of injustices done against Palestinians. So we have non-Muslims who risk their lives to go to Israel and report back on what is happening out there, yet Muslim leaders pay lip servicebut if they do talk their words are rarely followed by action. We were sat helpless when tragedies in Bosnia took place, but who took action? It was NATO who did what Muslims should have done (without killing Serbian civilians).

When the mass murder of civilians took place at the World Trade Centre last year, Pres. Bush took decisive action and tried to crush Al-Qaida and capture bin Laden, the prime suspect behind the bombing. The killing of civilians in Afghanistan is not supported though. However, when 3,000 civilians were massacred in New York it did not take Pres. Bush much time to act quickly. How many deaths do Muslims need to suffer before a Muslim leader takes decisive action? How many more Jenins need to take place before a Muslim leader says enough is enough? Where is that decisive Muslim leadership? I look at various Muslim leaders in various Muslim countries, but I do not find the qualities of leadership which one should expect to find. I have more respect for Pres. Bush junior than the current Muslim leaders because at least he has taken action for the 3,000 people who died (which included Muslims) in New York (although I dont agree with killing Afghan civilians), whereas hundreds and thousands of Muslims had died over the last 50 yrs. in many places, yet not one Muslim leader has taken action, apart from Ayatollah Khomeini who cut off oil supplies to Israel in 1979 and King Faisal who suspended oil supplies to the USA which got him killed. We are living in a time when massacres of Muslims and other peoples are taking place, and this is meant to be the 21st Century.

So what has this got to do with your article on the hijab? It is to show that we Muslims need to re-focus on our priorities. We cannot afford the time to talk about the pros and cons of a piece of cloth for women when lives are being lost. As you are the wife of a Muslim leader, it is hoped that this message would translate into some form of action to help the Muslims and Christians in Israel/Palestine. We muslims tend to talk too much and I have heard of many speeches by Muslim groups and leaders which do not result in action. We have become a nation of sloganeers and non-action. But if this letter encourages you to take some form of action, be it militarily, verbally or diplomatically then this would have been worthwhile.

You have connections with other Muslim leaders, but since I have little faith in most of these leaders, it would be better to use your influence amongst the people who have influence on Israeli policy, namely the US administration. I would hope that the US Govt. can take a more even-handed approach to the Palestinian issue. It has been done before after the Gulf War when Pres. Bush senior suspended $10 billion worth of housing loans to Israel because they were building settlements on Occupied Territories. Despite the powerful Israeli lobby in American politics, he took that decisive action which cost him his election in 1992. The late Prime Minister Yitzak Rabin gave some land back to the Muslims, for which he paid the ultimate price by an Israeli assassin. Which Muslim leader in recent history can come anywhere near Bush or Rabin when it comes to taking action against injustices against Palestinians and then paying the price for it? Apart from the late King Faisal of Saudi Arabia, I cant think of anyone else. There are many Israelis who are protesting against Ariel Sharon. There are also Israeli soldiers who refuse to serve in the Occupied Territories because they dont agree with their Govts treatment of Palestinians. Maybe this is where your influence might be useful. We need to build relations with Jewish peace movement in Israel and have dialogues with the Jewish communities in the West based on the Quran. That will be the ultimate solution to the problems in Israelpeace is the only option.

I hope that the above statements I made will translate into some form of action as you are in an influential position and that Israel is only next door to you.

Below, I am giving you a response to your comments about hijab since you did raise this topic, but I would hope that at this point in the letter, you will put it away and take some action, as I mentioned above. But if you really want to read my response below, then please do so, although you would be focusing on the wrong priorities.

My secondary response is as follows:

Within the last 20-30 years I have noticed a phenomenon which I would term as feminist revisionism. That is the reinterpretation of Muslim text from a purely feminist perspective, thus overturning 1400 yrs of accepted laws. I have come across two books that aim to reinterpret gender dynamics in the modern context from Muslim sources. They are:

- Women and Islam - An Historical and Theological Enquiry, by Fatima Mernissi 
- Quran and Woman Rereading the Sacred Text from a Womans Perspective by Amina Wadud.
- I have also come across Prof. Leila Ahmed who wrote the book, Gender and Islam.

Mernissis work

Mernissi is a lecturer at Mohammed V University in Morrocco. Her book tries to prove that for 1400 years Islamic laws had been dominated by male chauvinists and restricted womens freedoms until the 20th Century when democracy championed the rights of women. With regards to the hijab, her argument is that the first verse that talks about the hijab in fact was a curtain to separate Muhammad (S) from Anas bin Malik (R), a Companion of the Prophet. This was when Muhammad (S) had married Zaynab (R) and wanted to be alone with her and because people at that time were too invasive. Hence the hijab initially descended initially to separate two men, i.e. Muhammad (S) and Malik (R). This is how the hijab is presented as a spatial barrier between two men. Another chapter deals with the item of clothing. Here Mernissi blames Umar (R) for the institution of the veil. She says that the veil is the exact opposite to what Muhammad (S) wanted to bring about for women. There were Hypocrites who attacked women and were summoned to explain why they did that. They would argue that these women were slaves. So a method was needed to separate slave women from free women and the institution of the veil did that. Mernissi says that the verse on the veil then descended which veiled free women. Mernissi then presents this as a victory for the Hypocrites who could continue harassing female slaves. She then says that Umars (R) solution to hide women was to overshadow Islams dimension as a civilisation. In the last part of her chapter, The Hijab Descends on Medina she says:

This body of thought [i.e. Umars] made dar-al-Islam at the outset a pioneering experiment in terms of individual freedom and democracy. But the hijab fell over Medina and cut short the brief burst of freedom. Paradoxically, 15 centuries later it was colonial power that would force the Muslim states to reopen the questions of the rights of the individual and of women 

In other words, Mernissis analysis of the veil is that it was something which was instigated by Umar (R) and was a victory for the hypocrites so that they could continue to abuse slaves whilst the free women were restricted. However, her last paragraph gives an idea of who initiated the debate on the hijab and the alleged Islamic restrictions on womens rights. I have yet to understand whether Fatima Mernissi believes that the Quran is Gods wordsfrom what she said about a particular verse does bring doubt.

Waduds work

Amina Wadud is an Islamic Studies Professor in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies and Virginia Commonwealth University. I picked up her book, Quran and Woman in New York. Here she re-interprets the various aspects of women in a modern context. She rejects the 1400 years of interpretation by apparent male chauvinists. She only devotes a paragraph to the hijab. She says that the verse regarding the veil should be regarded as a verse on modesty rather than seclusion. She incorporates the various cultural contexts which would determine what modesty is and may vary from culture to culture. This is more in line with your view. So Wadud supports an open interpretation of modesty which would vary according to cultural norms. She says in the introduction:

This method of restricting the particulars to a specific context, extracting the principles intended by the Quran through that particular, and then applying those principles to other particulars in various cultural contexts, forms a major variation from previous exegetical methodologies. The movement from principles to particulars can only be done by the members of whatever particular context a principle is to be applied. Therefore, interpretation of the Quran can never be final.

Prof. Leila Ahmed

I will not deal with Ahmed as I have not read her book, Gender and Islam and I do not know what her view is on the hijab. However, I did attend her lecture a few years ago at a London University. Polygamy is an interesting issue which feminist revisionists try to reinterpret. There is a verse in the Quran that allows men to have up to four wives as long as they are dealt with in a just manner. When Ahmed was asked about polygamy, she then countered with another verse in the Quran (4:129) which says:

You are never able to be just and fair as between women

Amina Wadud in her book quotes the same part of that verse. Thus it gives the impression that Polygamy is not allowed or is looked down on. However, both these women do not finish the verse. The full context is given below:

You will never be able to do perfect justice between wives even if it be your ardent desire, so do not incline too much to one of them so as to leave the other hanging. And if you do justice, and do all that is right and fear Allah by keeping away from all that is wrong, then Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

In other words the verse acknowledges that it will be difficult to do equal justice between wives, but it does say that we should not ignore the other wife if we incline toward the favourite. So the verse does accept and allow polygamywith justice. But feminist revisionists always reinterpret or quote out of context to argue against polygamy.

I would like to know your views on polygamy, do you believe this to be an anti-woman institution which is outdated in the modern context? Or do you accept that men can have up to four wives as long as they are dealt with in a just manner?

Back to Hijab

You mention in your article that the Quran does not tell women to cover their heads but only their bosoms and neck. As far as I understand, the khimr is the cloth which women used to wear on their heads but didnt cover their necks or bosoms. So the verse on the hijab is telling women to draw their khimrs over their bosoms. In other words the hair, as well as the neck and bosoms are covered. A booklet I recommend you to read is entitled, In Support of Hijaab by Umma Hanna and deals with arguments brought up by revisionists. Furthermore you ignore the hadiths which indicate how the Wives of the prophet (R) dressed and what Muhammad (S) told Asma (R), the daughter of Abu Bakr (R) when she wore thin clothing, i.e. a woman should be covered apart from the hands and face.

If you reject hadith on the basis that it is idolatry you have to explain why you reject hadith. I know you mention that the Quran says it is complete and the best hadith. However, it also says that in Muhammad (S) is the best example for us and that Allah reveals the Quran and it is for the Messenger to explain it. Hence we have a body of Hadith where Muhammad (S) explains various aspects of the Quran. How can this be idolatry considering that Allah alone is worshipped and no partners? The hadith literature is another topic altogether. I have come across the Quran alone group, whose lectures I have attended and also watched on video (Muhammad Shaikh being the advocate of The Book only) and have read literature by the Submitters which also advocate Quran alone, as well as the largest deception of Muslims in history, namely the alleged 19 miracle. I dont know whether you belong to any of these groups, if so we can talk about their beliefs and why I find their arguments to be faulty and contradictory.

Cultural contexts

If you still advocate the idea that modesty is relative to cultural contexts, then you would also agree that mini-skirts are ok to wear because in some cultures this is not seen as immoral. These are the types of clothing which I have noticed many women wear in Western countries:

1. Mini skirts
2. Micro skirts
3. Long skirts with slits on the sides
4. Mini skirts with slits on the sides!
5. Low cut blouses, even see-through blouses
6. Shorts
7. And if you are on the beeches then bikinis are the norms, with no moral objection whatsoever because bikinis are not regarded as immoral nor immodest. Some women would go even further and go topless on beechesagain within the environmental norms of the beech this is not seen as immodest nor immoral.

All he above descriptions of womens clothing in the West which have changed over the last 50 years would be regarded as norms in their relative cultural contexts. So by your argument, it would be ok for Muslim women to follow any of the above modes of dressing or undressing if they were in Western countries. This is the logical conclusion to your line of thinking. If you disagree, then what are your boundaries? The conventional Muslim line is that the boundaries are clear and absolute and come from our Creator and the Messenger (who explains the message). If you believe that there are absolute boundaries then logically there should no room for flexibility according to cultural relativism. If you believe in cultural relativism then there is no room for absolute boundaries. You cant have it both ways and you need to resolve this apparent contradiction.

Historical Inheritence and Piety

You mention that the veil was something which Jewish/Christian women used to wear before Islam, hence a remnant of the past and therefore nothing to do with Islam. This is a null argument. Just because some women wore the veil prior to Islam does not negate its validity in Islam. There may be practices which existed prior to Islam which would then be made compuslory or forbidden under Islam. Likewise, marriage is an institution which existed before Islam in other cultures and faith groups. Just because it existed beforehand does not negate its validity under Islam, in fact the status of marriage is strengthened. Also take the role of men as providers for women. This existed before Islam but has been made compulsory for men to provide for their wives and families under Islam. Hence to invoke history in order to disqualify the validity of hijab is null and void.

You also argue that if hijab was a sign of piety then Mother Teresa would have been the first woman to be counted. Again this is a null argument. If hijab is made compulsory by our Creator then that is the reason why women should follow it. Whether it is a sign of piety or not is neither here nor there. The reason for womens dress code is given by our Creator Himself, it is so that they will be known and not molested. Piety is irrelevant.

Complete Book?

The other aspect of your argument is that the Quran is complete in every thing. It is true that the Quran is the final message to Mankind till Judegement Day and no new message will come. But there are instances where the Quran does not have the answers to various situational problems hence we need ijtihad, which draws from the principles of the Quran and Sunnah and applies them to the new contexts. I do recall reading in a Hadith (dont know the reference) that a man came up to the prophet and asked what should be done if a problem arises and the solution is not in the Quran. He said that we should look to his sayings, if not then use your own judement. I need to find this hadith, however as far as I know the method of resolving new problems is to look into the Quran, if the answer is not there, then the sunnah, if not then the consensus of the Companions (R), if not then the scholars who would come up with a solution based on the principles of the Quran and Sunnah, if not then our own judgement. Part of the reason for the decline of the Muslim empire was that the gates of ijtihad were closed and the Ummah stagnated.You may ask what new problems could arise which are not in the Quran? Here are a few pointers:

1. Organ donations
2. Examination of human bodies for medical purposes
3. Stem Cell research on embryos to help with Parkinson disease patients
4. If and when Muslims venture into space there will be no such thing as night and day because the sun will always be there. So how should Muslims perform their prayers given that they will not be able to do the five daily prayers at the right time according to the movement of the Sun?
5. In space where there is no gravity, Muslims would not be able to go through the motions of prayer as they do on Earth, so how will they perform the prayer? And in which direction?
6. If Muslims go to Mars and the time of Fasting comes (assuming they can fastwhich might be detrimental to their health) which of the two moons should they follow with regards to timing, Deimos or Phobos?
7. If in a couple of hundred years time, new life is discovered elsewhere or we meet intelligent beings from other planets, how are we to deal with first contact and subsequent contacts?

The Quran states that men can go to space but it doesnt specify how we are to observe the rituals should we venture out. This is where ijtihad comes in. The Quran states that there is life elsewhere in the universe but doesnt specify how we should interact with an intellligent alien species. Again, this is where ijtihad comes inI might add here that the Catholic Church is ahead on this and has worked out how to handle contact with new civilisations and what impact this contact might have on established religions, especially Christianity (for further reading I recomemmend a book called, Are We Alone? by Prof. Paul Davis. He examines the difficulties that Christianity might face if new civilisations are discovered elsewhere in the universe and how Christians are dealing with this. But I would add that this would be no problem whatsoever for Islam as our Creator has mentioned about life elsewhere in the universe).

This is what I see so far, when a clear verse on the hijab is revealed (with explanation by the Messenger) you say that this is open to interpretation according to relative cultural norms. However, when ijtihad is carried out on areas where there is no clear answer in the Quran, you say this is idolatry. Can you see the contradiction in your line of thinking?

Conclusion

Again let me thank you for your contribution and a response to my arguments would be welcome. But your primary response to acts of aggression against innocent civilians in Jenin would be even more welcome.

Wassalam

Hasan

Dear Mr. Osama Fouzi
I am a frequent reader of your newspaper and appreciate your courage to 
bring the truth in front of the world. This is the reason your newspaper is 
not being encouraged by other arabian countries.

I would like to bring your kind attention to my case. I am Giameel Saleh a 
native of yemen and now a canadian citizen.
I had been working as a contrat soldier for the Emirates where i was totally 
denied my rights. I did not receive my entitlement, I asked for it throught 
the yemeni Foreign Minister in accordance with the Emirate's Foreign 
Ministry order and the Armed Forces Chief of Staff.
I wrote an article to the Yemeni periodical Al-jamaheri where i exposed my 
case, After which i was granted a visa of entrace from Emirates Embassy of 
Sanaa with the promise of teh order of the join chief of staff of the army 
force. The councell informed me that i will receive my entitlement once 
inside the UAE. When i arrieved on the 16th july 1998, I was instead 
arrested by the national security and the poilice forces and imprisoned. 
Where i was tortured, mentally and physically abused by the National 
security for 4 continious months along with fabrication of 3 criminal cases 
in UAE in 1996( i was not even in UAE at that time)

Fortunately i managed to escape from the jail and came back to canada. Then 
i filed the case to the United Nations High commission of Human Rights in 
Geneva and also in Canadian Aministry International along with all the valid 
proof in form of official documents from different departments.

Sir, I would request you to publish my case and i will be very happy to 
provide you with all the information and documents.

Thank you
Giameel Saleh
Tel:1-613-231-5977
379 Arlington Ave
Ottawa, Ont
K1R6Z4
Canada

Good day i just wanted to give u some notes about samih buttikhi's family..
his 2 children are studying in kent england they couldnt go back to jordan 
on easter and they cant go back at all because the airport has thier names 
because thier father used thier signatures in the operation..also samih's 
elder son haitham is married to the daughter of abd il kareem al kabareety 
and haitham does not talk to his father because of the problems..as well 
geel the ex wife of buttikhi was planning to marry her son to the daughter 
of king hussien but when the king died she couldnt she tried to wait but now 
the problem happened everything ended...also buttikhi wanted to involve 
kabareety in the bank problems but kabareety as u know is working in gulf 
bank he knew everything and he was one of the people to discover the 
issue...so thats all for now and if you have anything about buttikhi send me 
ok i am waithing for your reply and if you want other things about him or 
his family i am willing to give you all the information you need....

To The Editor,

I am Muhammad Al Daya,the Son of Yasser Arafat, and his bodyguard till my 
death,till the last minute of my life.everybody knows who I am, and Knows 
who u r.

I am alive, I live in Gaza,now, I am in my home in Gaza, I am free, and 
healthy, u can send your correspondent, if there is any, to me, to interview 
me..in my home, or in the street,or any where he??? would like to.he can ask 
me any question he wants, better than creating stories,and lies about me and 
my Father,and leader .
I wish he would asked me why I am not in Ramallah, so I would answer him, 
that u may ask the Mosad,why they are not giving me a permission to be 
there, and I belive he has alot of connections with them.well , I am in 
Gaza, because of a personal mattar with my Father/leader Yasser Arafat..u 
can ask Him about it.
I wish you would ask those who created ,this story about me, that it is the 
truth,and that they can swear on it by allah.and I wish you will ask allah 
for amnisty for what u published againt me.
these are ONLY zaionest stories,and hatread,and jelious, I know who is 
standing behind it..and I can reach him, or them soon.

My Father tought me,and my brothers to LOVE arafat, and that what I feel, 
his love is in my blood.I have Only One Master, Allah,and One leader: Yasser 
Arafat.
I will be standing behind Araft till Al Quds, inshallah..
Hasbia Allah wa Niema el Wakeel.
Muhammad Al Daya,

pls call for any question, I am ready to answer..
and pls, publish this.

Osamh Fuzy ,
I never saw low man in my entire life like you. Your stupid magazine has low 
news like you are. You talk stupid about Osamh bin Laden who is a brave man 
and better a million times than you are. I just want to Know where you get 
your stupid low news, but it is not a surprise for a magazine managed by 
somebody like you to talk about brave men such as Osamh bin Laden and Abul 
Bari Atwan. If you are honest why do not talk about Royal Saudi who are the 
main source of corruption and problems in the Muslim word or about the U.S 
government which the biggest murders and biggest terrorist organisation in 
the Word. Why do not talk about house destruction, Palestinians killing and 
humiliation done by American weapons and money. It is a shame that your name 
Osamh, because you do not deserve to have a name Osamh.

People, it seems that everyone is so convinced with this story. That Prophet Muhammad married the daughter of Abu Bakr when she was at 9Yrs. and waited till she had grown a bit older before he consummated the marriage!

The story of Aiysha and Prophet Muhammad was, in a particular years during his early days, a skin disease had developed among several girls fro the villages and surrounding areas. Aiysha, the daughter of Abu Bakr, was one of them. After a while (3 years or so) most girls had recovered. However, none of the near by men wanted to marry anyone of those girls, since they became (damaged goods!) We all should understand the mentality then. 
Prophet Muhammad, advised a woman toconsult with his friend Abu Bakr for his daughter's hand. 
Then, If the prophet himself, married one of those (damaged girls) then all other girls are good enough for the rest of the men!! At the time, Aiysha had reached (17 springs) of age. Which means, 17 years old. That was very old for 
a woman to be unmarried at the time. Hell, its still old today, in most Arabian Gulf countries. 17 years old and not married still?! They call her A'annes.

And this is the story of Muhammad (PBUH) and Aiysha. Muhammad did not marry a toddler. He married (A was) sick girl, to encourage all other young men to marry them as well. Also, other than his dead wives, which caused him to 
re-marry several times. He married many other women, because he was trying to bring all tribes at the time together, and make a nation out of them, by marriage and blood relations, where all would end up being cousins and relatives. (like King Hussein of Jordan, is a Prophet Muhammed siblings) :) :) Ok, enough with Jokes.

It is important, yet urgent, for us people to understand these stories and where did they come from.
Of course the Qura'an is not going to state such story. This story -supposedly- was generated from the Prophet's quotes (Ahadeeth Shareefah). Are all these quotes true?! Are all these stories true?
Just because its sounds old, that does not make it true. Never.

Perhaps, it was from book out of Iran years back, that was generated by some of those so called Muslim Mullas who had a good taste for little girls, and one of them actually stepped up and said such preposterous story, so later on can justify it for himself, when he gets his hands on a 10 or 11 years old baby girl. Later on it was transferred from Iran areas, down to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and surrounding territories.

To be more specific, take a look at the Asian Islamic printings (Other than the Qura'an). Most of such printing and publications, speaks with nothing but ridiculous statements, and ambiguous suspicious quotations on behalf of prophet Muhammad, to how to wash your hands, or how to wash the "Penis" and the "Vegina", how a woman should bend her legs back ward at the first night of marriage,,etc!! Or quotations from his wife "A'ysha" how he used to suck her tongue (foreplay!)Most, if not all, about a man and a woman relation and sexualities!! Absolutely disgusting and not true.

Prophet Muhammad was not a child molester, I'm sure with his prophecy, was a little more sophisticated than that. Otherwise, he would bogus, and the whole issue of Islam would be a hoax!

It was those half educated Muslims of Iran, that taught the 10% educated Asians (Pakistanis and others) such crap. However, such garbage was returned to us in the Arab territories, and we believed in such pornography, religiously.

To whome it may conserne

I would like to inform you that my postage mail that my dad send me from 
jordan was opened and checked by some one there. When i went to the 
postoffice to file a complained, the lady said " Sir this is how we received 
you letter, damaged". So do you think we can file a complained in Jordan or 
we can only file our compliants with the GOD and GOD only. But you know what 
next time I'm gonna have my father send his "balls" in the letter so the sun 
of a bitch can learn a lesson. Basteredes man bastereds.

Hi Dr. Osama, I was wondering if you heard the opening ceremony of Jarash Festival in the presence of Queen Lisa. It reads like this " Besm el mubdi3 bism al kalag nabda", it seems they eliminated the world Allah from Jordan now, now Jordan's official religion is Christianity, even the top positions now all are being filled by Christian Jordanians. Not that I have anything about Christians, but is that a coincident, or is it orchestrated ?.

DEAR DR. OSAMA,
I AM ONE OF YOUR READERS, ENJOING EVERY TIME READING WHAT WE HAVE IN OUR BAD COUNTRIES AND GOVERNMEMTS IN THE ARAB WORLD
WHICH YOU PROVIDE US EVERY TIME IN OUR LOVELY NEWSPAPER(ARAB
TIMES)NOW I HAVE A NEWS FROM DAMASCUS;
THE EMARAT AIRLINE STATION IN SYRIA HAS A SMALL (KALB) WHO HANDLE
HIS PENNIES ON HIS SHOLDER AND RUNNING BEHIND EVERY GIRL OR LADY
COMING SEEKING A JOB IN THIS OFFICE.
MANSOUR AL HASHIMI 26 YEARS OLD COULD NOT BELIEF THAT THERE ARE 
HONEST AND(SHREFA) IN SYRIA, SO HE OFFER ANY ONE CLEARLY THAT SHE HAS TO (ERKABI AOW EZHABI), AND HE START WITH THE OFFICE OLD EMPLOYEES WHICH THEY HAVE TOO MANY YEARS WORKING IN THIS OFFICE BEFORE HE CAME THERE,WHEN ONE OF THE OLD MANAGER REFUSED HIS SEXUAL OFFER BY TELLING HIM THAT HE SOULD RECOGNISE BETWEEN (SHAREEFA AND GAIR SHAREEFA) BECAUSE NOT EVERY ONE ACCEPT ADULTRY, AND ASKED HIM IF HE ACCEPTED THIS TO HIS MOTHER ,SISTER OR WIFE,AND IF IS NOT AFRAID FROM (ALLAH) AND THE SYRIAN GOVERNMENT,HE REPLIED (I DON'T CARE AL RABE'A KULHUM ASHABI).
DEAR DR FAWZI IN THE SAME TIME I WISH IF YOU CAN PUPLISH THIS IN UOR ESTEEMED NEWSPAPER I WOULD LIKE YOU TO ADVISE ME WHAT CAN DO 
FOR SUCH(KALB) LEGALY(HERE AND THERE) TO GIVE HIM UNFORGETABLE LESSONE IN HIS LIFE.
THANK YOU 
M.NAJDAT ABU BASHEER